• Contact
  • About Us
Friday, February 6, 2026
  • Login
Turkey Tribune
  • Turkey
  • World
  • Business
  • Travel
  • Opinion
  • Turkestan
No Result
View All Result
  • Turkey
  • World
  • Business
  • Travel
  • Opinion
  • Turkestan
No Result
View All Result
Turkey Tribune
No Result
View All Result
Home Archive

Lagarde vs. Rehn: Needed debate, or dangerous split?

TT English Edition by TT English Edition
April 15, 2021
in Archive
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
393
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on XShare on Whatsapp

Big divisions are appearing among the key players responsible for the eurozone’s tough austerity program.

The International Monetary Fund and the European Commission are at odds over which is the best way forward.

As millions of Europeans feel the biting impact of austerity measures, IMF boss Christine Lagarde says it’s time to hit the brakes.

German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble says changing directions now would lead to a critical loss of confidence in the whole plan.

And European Commission Vice President Olli Rehn says the IMF’s findings “can be disputed.”

It started on Monday when the IMF said that specific debt reduction targets, which underpin most of the austerity programs in place across recession-ravaged Europe, have a much deeper impact that expected.

New IMF research says that pruning a budget deficit by one percentage point could mean a cut in economic growth of between 0.9% and 1.7%. That is up to three times more severe than the current economic models suggest.

In other words, debt reduction is having a much more severe affect on growth than first thought.

It’s led Lagarde to say that the austerity programs should not focus on specific targets and that countries should be given more time to cut their debt.

Schäuble shot back the next day. He told the Financial Times “when there is a certain medium-term goal it doesn’t build confidence when one starts going in a different direction.”

“When you want to climb a big mountain and you start climbing back down the mountain, then the mountain will get even higher,” he said.

Next to weigh in was Olli Rehn. He told me today that he was not yet buying the IMF argument.

“The findings can be disputed and I am looking forward to extensive negotiations on this,” he said.

“Even the IMF can be open to criticism — it does not have the final word.”

So, a needed debate or a dangerous split? Rehn, ever the diplomat, says he sees this as a sign of “healthy policy debate over the right course of action.”

But he does support the German view. “He (Schäuble) has a point. The EU cannot be making swift turns, rather it is a convoy and you have to carefully consider which policy turns are best.”

The EU will produce its own conclusions about the impact of austerity measures next month. Whether that brings us any closer to a consensus is hard to judge.

Remember the old joke about economists: if you laid all the economists in the world end-to-end you still wouldn’t reach a conclusion.

But this is no joking matter. Millions of Europeans have fallen into poverty or at least economic hardship as a result of the current austerity programs.

Getting the right mix of policies to deal with the crisis not an option, it’s an imperative.

(CNN)

Tags: eulegarderehnTurkey
TT English Edition

TT English Edition

Become a Columnist!

Share your voice on TT

  • Turkey
  • Arts & Culture
  • Business
  • Invest
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Thought & Litrature
  • Turkestan
  • World
Turkey Tribune

© 2026 Turkey Tribune. All rights reserved

Turkey Tribune - Turkey's International Voice

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Write For Us
  • Free Books

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Turkey
  • Arts & Culture
  • Business
  • Invest
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Thought & Litrature
  • Turkestan
  • World

© 2026 Turkey Tribune. All rights reserved

Your text